Archives

Gore Vidal - A New Millennial Thinker?

Posted on February 13, 2014 at 4:10 PM

By Dennis Stone


 

I remember seeing Gore Vidal on the “Tonight Show” and other talk shows when I was a kid. He was an extraordinarily intelligent man, a brilliant writer, a witty conversationalist, and a liberal of near-radical proportions. He was also monumentally pompous and, when provoked, quite vicious. I don’t recall at what point I learned he was gay (well, sort of gay; more about that shortly), but in those days it was remarkable to see on television anyone who was identified as gay – that exotic and rather dangerous species of human.


 

Vidal wrote a series of gay-themed novels, the first of which, “The City And the Pillar,” was published in 1948. (Among his more renowned works were “Myra Breckinridge” and the screenplay for “Ben-Hur.”) He also had a lot of gay sex with anonymous hustlers and hookups (he claimed to have had sex with over 1000 men before he was 25), and had a 53-year relationship with his soul mate Howard Austen. But Vidal rejected the concept of “gay” as an identity. “Trying to make categories is very American, very stupid, and very dangerous,” he said. The more I read about his attitudes the more it seems to me that he interpreted sexuality in the context of what we are lately calling “fluidity.” In those views he seems extraordinarily “new millennial,” even though his career spanned the second half of the 20th century.





 

His ideal was the golden era of Greece, where bisexuality was the norm. “Gay people” didn’t really exist in Greece to any appreciable extent. Men would have sex with boys, but also marry and father children. Vidal thought that it was both incorrect and wrong to put people into sexual boxes and label them.


 

Tim Teeman has written a book about this fascinating man called “In Bed With Gore Vidal.” Teeman talked to most everyone who knew Vidal, and paints an extensive portrait of one of the most fascinating men of the 20th century. Teeman isn’t so sure that Vidal was really post-gay before his time. He thinks his unwillingness to label himself came more out of the social fear that was felt by many of his generation – though it’s hard for me to buy the idea that someone that fierce, who hid nothing about his life, would really be afraid of a label. Teeman also suggests he was hesitant to label himself because he wanted to be president. He was the grandson of a U.S. senator, and fifth cousin to Jimmy Carter. He did run for office, unsuccessfully, at least twice.


 

I’ve talked before about how predictable so many commentators are today. Conservatives, liberals, religious people, gay activists – all of them are so mind-numbingly predictable on any issue. Almost none of them see nuance or gray areas or possibilities beyond their narrow focus. Gore Vidal was anything but predictable. He was generally considered far left in his thought, but, he said, “I think of myself as a conservative.” He was a Democrat throughout his life, but nonetheless said this: “There is only one party in the United States, the Property Party ... and it has two right wings: Republican and Democrat.” He seemed to investigate all issues with an independent mind unbeholden to preconceived ideas.


 

Gore Vidal was a prickly, combative pain in the ass in a lot of ways, but he was a brilliant, witty, independent-minded pain in the ass. We could use a few of him today.

 

Categories: History Lessons

Post a Comment

Oops!

Oops, you forgot something.

Oops!

The words you entered did not match the given text. Please try again.

Already a member? Sign In

4 Comments

Reply Manny Espinola
1:54 AM on November 28, 2017 
He was a superior essayist but (for me) a bad fictionist. Some of his contemporaries say he liked young rough trade and he preferred to top them. He locked on to the Erastes side of his Greek Erastes-Eromenos thing all his life.
Reply Ulysses Dietz
7:54 AM on March 14, 2014 
I admired him and read most of his books (if not all of them). He was arrogant, but he had to be to survive the shit piled on him by his enemies. His stance on being gay is annoying, but totally understandable given his own life, his own determination to be himself, and his own impatience with the stupidity around him. So I forgive him and praise him as a gay hero (whether he wanted to be one or not). :)
Reply Eyal
10:34 PM on February 18, 2014 
Anyone who remembers the live coverage of the Democratic Convention of 1968 in Chicago witness Vidal?s nemeses William F. Buckley Jr. reverting to name calling when he could not rationally respond to comments that Vidal made about how the Republicans and Mayor Daily were responding to the demonstrations. It was a historical exchange and the feud continued throughout their lives.
Reply PaulR
3:01 PM on February 14, 2014 
Wow, he was an attractive guy when he was young. I see why he was able to have sex with 1000 guys! I always thought he identified as gay. Probably because his novels were so overtly gay. And I think I saw him referred to as gay many times in newspapers or magazines. Even if he hadn't been seen as gay he was too flaky to ever win elective office.